Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

This PR adds an example of force/torque actuation/readings using a KUKA LBR4 #8

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ffasilva
Copy link
Member

@ffasilva ffasilva commented Jul 10, 2023

Hi, @dqrobotics/developers,

This PR adds an example of force/torque actuation/readings using a Franka Emika Panda. The motivation is to test the new methods added to the class DQ_VrepInterface and the new class FrankaEmikaPandaVrepRobot added in 104.

Kind regards,
Frederico

P.S.: As described in the .m file, the necessary scene is available in OSF.

Update:

Replaced Panda torque control example by KUKA LBR4 control example.

@ffasilva ffasilva changed the title This PR adds an example of force/torque actuation/readings using a Franka Emika Panda This PR adds an example of force/torque actuation/readings using a KUKA LBR4 Aug 15, 2024
@ffasilva ffasilva requested a review from juanjqo August 15, 2024 16:18
Copy link
Member

@juanjqo juanjqo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ffasilva please add the copyright

@ffasilva
Copy link
Member Author

@juanjqo,

@ffasilva please add the copyright

Added in 3ead834.

@ffasilva ffasilva requested a review from juanjqo August 15, 2024 16:32
Copy link
Member

@juanjqo juanjqo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bvadorno I do not have more comments here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants